TCP Performance Report - Worst Performing Applications report

TCP Performance Report - Worst Performing Applications report overview

The TCP Performance Report - Worst Performing Applications report shows the most poorly performing applications in terms of retransmitted packets or session establishment delay.

Use cases

User quality of experience—Use the report to identify low-quality application delivery and address user QoE issues by monitoring TCP performance to see the worst performing applications.

Report characteristics

The following table lists the principal report characteristics.

Table 9-11: TCP Performance Report - Worst Performing Applications report characteristics

Characteristic

Value

Statistics type

AA Cflowd TCP performance application

Note: Cflowd aggregation per IP group must be enabled.

NSP Flow Collector required

Yes

Domains

Residential / Wi-Fi (ESM)

Mobile

Wi-Fi (DSM)

Business

Report inputs

Prompt

Notes

End date

Calendar date or relative date (for example, two days ago) and time

Granularity

Aggregation types:

  • None (raw data)

  • Hourly

  • Daily

  • Monthly

Report range

Length of time to be reported, in minutes, hours, days, or months

Node Type

Search using partial names or wildcard (%).

Select individual items or click Select All.

Node

Group/Partition

Application Group

Top Applications

Number of items to report

Client IP Group

Search using partial names or wildcard (%).

Select individual items or click Select All.

Server IP Group

Metrics

Retransmitted packets, session establish time

Direction

Client-server, server-client

Drill-down support

No

Example

The following figure shows a report example.

Figure 9-28: TCP Performance Report - Worst Performing Applications report
TCP Performance Report - Worst Performing Applications report